Superpower Health Review 2026: What the $349 Panel Caught

Like our Content? Stay connected via Google

Follow us for the latest health and wellness information.

Updated September 7, 2026

If you want a more proactive approach to your health, the membership model from Superpower deserves a real look and I put it through its paces so you do not have to guess. In this Superpower Health review I share exactly what the panel caught in my own bloodwork, what the app does well, where it falls short and who it is right for. I have tested several at-home blood panels over the years, including Function Health and Hundred Health, so I came in with a clear sense of what good looks like.

Running three of these services inside one year gave me something almost no other Superpower review has, which is a way to check one platform's numbers against two others on the same body. Most of what Superpower reported held up. One headline metric did not and I get into that below because I think it is the single most useful thing I can tell you about this category.

Two things changed since I first published this Superpower blood test review. On September 1, 2026 the membership went from $199 to $349 a year and a second blood draw became part of the base price rather than an extra purchase. Separately, Function Health filed a false advertising lawsuit over how Superpower counts its biomarkers. I cover both below, because if you read a review still quoting $199 and one annual panel, you are reading about a product that no longer exists.

Disclaimer: Links may contain affiliate links, which means we may get paid a commission at no additional cost to you if you purchase through this page. Read our full disclosure here.

What Is Superpower Health?

Superpower is a membership-based health platform that pairs comprehensive blood panels with an AI-assisted dashboard and a care team you can message any time. Founded in 2023, its pitch is to make the kind of deep biomarker testing once reserved for expensive concierge clinics accessible for one annual fee. The company says its testing screens for early signs of more than 1,000 conditions, well beyond the roughly 15 markers most standard physicals cover. Here is what a membership includes as of September 2026.

• Two blood draws a year: a comprehensive baseline panel of roughly 90 biomarkers, then a later retest of about 60 of those same markers. Superpower markets the pair as 150+ biomarkers annually.
• Draws at any of 2,000+ partner lab locations, or at home for an added fee. Results in 10 days or less.
• A dashboard with a Superpower Score, a biological age estimate, 17 health scores and a color-coded Digital Twin of your results.
• 24/7 AI concierge plus care-team access to ask questions and shape your plan.
• A personalized action plan, plus a marketplace where member pricing covers supplements, add-on diagnostics and prescriptions when clinically appropriate.
• Wearable syncing with Oura, Whoop and Apple Health, plus the ability to upload past lab results so you can see trends rather than a single snapshot.

One structural note before the numbers. When I first tested Superpower, the membership included a single annual panel and a second one cost extra. That is no longer how it works. The second draw is now built into the price, which is a real improvement, and it is also the main thing the higher fee is buying you. Any review describing one included panel plus a paid retest is out of date.

Superpower positions itself as a preventive, performance-oriented health intelligence platform rather than a reactive healthcare service. The idea is to catch shifts early, while you still feel fine, so you have time to act. That framing is useful, but it only pays off if you follow through on what the data tells you, which is a theme I keep coming back to in this Superpower Health review.

How Much Does the Superpower Blood Test Cost in 2026?

Superpower costs $349 a year as of September 1, 2026. Before that date it was $199, a founding rate the company had flagged as temporary for months before it expired. If you signed up under the old price and are looking at your renewal, that is the increase you are seeing.

What Changed on September 1, 2026

Run the per-draw math and the increase is less dramatic than 75 percent sounds. Under the old structure, two panels in a year cost $199 plus the price of a second panel. Under the new one, two draws cost $349 flat. What you have lost is the option to pay $199 and test once, which was one reason to pick Superpower over everything else in the first place.

Superpower prices its add-on diagnostics inside the member dashboard rather than on its public site and those figures move. Rather than publish numbers I cannot verify today, my guidance is simpler and has not changed: run the included panels by themselves the first year. Let the results tell you where an add-on would earn its money, then buy one targeted panel the following cycle. Buying four add-ons up front is how people end up with a pile of data they never act on.

Is There a Superpower Discount Code?

Short answer, mostly no, so you don't end you hunting through coupon sites. Superpower does not run a standing promo code the way a supplement brand does. What it does run is short seasonal promotions, usually $50 off a first year, tied to holiday weekends and end-of-year. If you are not in a hurry, waiting for one of those windows is the most reliable way to pay less than list, but you'll always get the best price available using this link.

The larger saving is the tax break. Because Superpower is HSA and FSA eligible and is not billed to insurance, paying with those funds effectively discounts the membership by whatever your marginal rate saves you, often 25 to 35 percent. On a $349 membership that is roughly $87 to $122, which is a bigger discount than any coupon I have seen for this service. Worth knowing before you commit: Superpower states it does not offer refunds.

The 100+ Biomarker Question and the Function Health Lawsuit

This is the part of the category almost nobody explains properly and it deserves a plain answer, because “how many biomarkers do I get” is the question everyone is comparing on.

On January 26, 2026, Function Health filed a false advertising and unfair competition complaint against Superpower Health in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, under the federal Lanham Act and California state law. The centerpiece of the complaint is Superpower's marketing of “100+ lab tests” and “100+ biomarkers.” Function alleges that a membership delivers roughly 55 direct laboratory measurements, with the rest of the headline figure coming from calculated ratios and indices derived from those measurements rather than from additional tests. The case is pending. Both companies are operating normally and nothing has been decided.

What I can tell you is what Superpower now says about its own arithmetic, because it has become much more specific since the filing. Its current comparison pages carry a footnote explaining that the 150+ figure “includes direct laboratory measurements and calculated health metrics” and reflects an initial draw of about 90 biomarkers plus a built-in retest of about 60 of the same markers. Read that slowly. The headline number counts calculated values alongside measured ones and it counts the retested markers a second time.

Here is the part I find most useful as Function Health does exactly the same arithmetic. Its “160+ lab tests” is an annual panel of about 100 biomarkers plus a mid-year retest of roughly 60 of those same markers, published as one combined number. Superpower's own comparison page lays this out openly, and Function's own site confirms the two-draw structure. So the company doing the suing counts the same way the company being sued does.

My take, having run both: the marketing numbers on every platform in this category are inflated in the same direction and the honest comparison is not 150 against 160. It is roughly 90 distinct markers against roughly 100, tested twice each, at $349 against $365. That is a much narrower gap than either company's homepage suggests and it means you should choose on what happens after the results land rather than on the marker count. Whatever the court decides, the useful takeaway is already available: treat any headline biomarker figure in this category as a marketing number and go look at the actual panel list as well as what the platform offers you before you buy.

How Superpower Works: My Experience

The sign-up flow was simple and one of the first things I noticed was how many wearables and health apps Superpower connects with. If that matters to you, check that it links to your device before you commit. Here is how the process went for me from start to finish.

1. I signed up for the membership. I joined under the old $199 founding rate. New members now pay $349.
2. I scheduled a blood draw at a nearby Quest location right through the dashboard. You can also choose a home draw for an added fee.
3. My baseline panel covered heart and vascular health, liver, kidney, sex hormones, metabolic health, nutrient status, inflammation, thyroid and immune markers.
4. Superpower now says results land in 10 days or less. I was tested on November 3 and had my full results on November 7, so four days from draw to dashboard.
5. I received a personalized plan with lifestyle, diet, supplement and prescription suggestions, unlimited concierge messaging, a biological age and a Superpower Score to track over time.

The lab visit was easily scheduled through the Superpower dashboard and I got a text almost immediately with contact info for the health concierge team plus reminder texts leading up to the draw. The hand-holding was better than I expected. I want to be careful not to overclaim on this point, because other reviewers have reported scheduling failures and I get into that in the legitimacy section below. My experience was smooth. Theirs was not. Both things can be true of a company scaling this fast.

What My Superpower Blood Test Results Caught

This is where a review earns its keep, so here are my real numbers rather than a generic walkthrough. Two of the headline metrics were reassuring. My biological age came back at 45.2, which the app calculated as 8.1 years younger than my calendar age. After over 30 years in fitness and lifting five days a week, seeing that in hard data was satisfying rather than surprising. Hold that number lightly though, because the next section is entirely about why I no longer take it at face value.

My overall Superpower Score landed at 78 out of 100 on the Digital Twin summary, a solid baseline with clear room to nudge upward. The Twin view maps your data onto a body model and color-codes each system, which makes it easy to see at a glance where you are strong and where to focus.

The most valuable finding was one my standard physical had never checked. My serum iron came back at 175 mcg/dL and my iron saturation at 49 percent, both above range. My ferritin was 70 ng/mL, solidly in the optimal window, meaning iron has not been accumulating in my tissues. Superpower framed it as exactly the right moment to investigate, early enough to make a change before negative consequences. I appreciated that the recommendation was measured rather than alarmist and it is now something I am keeping an eye on after lowering it with a blood donation.

Context matters on that 49 percent, and this is where having the full picture beats having one flagged number. The EASL clinical practice guidelines on haemochromatosis, published in the Journal of Hepatology, set provisional iron overload at transferrin saturation above 45 percent together with ferritin above 200 mcg/L in women, and at transferrin saturation above 50 percent with ferritin above 300 mcg/L in men and postmenopausal women. Both criteria are a pairing, not a single number. My saturation cleared the lower threshold while my ferritin sat far below either ferritin cutoff, which is why the finding was worth watching rather than worth panicking about.

That iron finding is the honest case for a service like this. It is a marker most annual physicals skip, it showed up while I still felt completely fine and it was actionable within a week. Nothing about my symptoms would have prompted my doctor to order it.

The Biological Age Number I Do Not Trust

Here is the part no other Superpower review can give you, because it requires having paid for three of these services inside about five months. I did and the biological age results did not agree with each other. Not by a little.

Function Health and Hundred Health landed within 0.7 years of each other. Superpower came in 7.9 years higher than Function on the same body, the same training history and the same broad set of blood markers. Nothing about my health changed by eight years over one winter.

I want to be fair about the caveats before I draw conclusions. My Superpower draw came about four months before the other two and biomarkers do move. I had also donated blood between the tests, which shifted my iron picture. Those factors could account for some of the gap but they cannot account for eight years.

The real explanation is simpler and more useful. Biological age is not a measurement, it is a model output. Each company builds its own algorithm, feeds it a different set of inputs and calibrates it against a different reference population. I even have a biological age calculator you can use for free that's built on research that shows biological age can be calculated from a simple blood test. Change the model and you change the answer and the research bears this out. A 2025 cross-tissue analysis in Aging Cell ran common epigenetic aging clocks across five tissue types from the same 83 people and found within-person differences averaging close to 30 years for some clocks depending on which sample the estimate was built from. If established research clocks can disagree that dramatically inside one person, three commercial platforms disagreeing by eight years is not shocking at all.

So how should you use the number? Three rules I now follow:

• Never compare biological age across platforms. The scores are not interchangeable and treating them as if they are will either scare you or flatter you for no reason.
• Treat it as a trend line inside one service. Superpower's number is useful for watching my own direction over repeated Superpower panels, which is what the second included draw is for.
• Trust the raw biomarkers over the composite scores. My iron saturation of 49 percent is a real, verifiable lab value. My biological age is an opinion dressed as a number. The panel is worth paying for because of the former, not the latter.

None of this makes Superpower a bad product. It makes the marketing around biological age, across this whole industry, oversold. I go deeper into how these scores are calculated and which methods have the strongest evidence in my biological age test guide.

Superpower for Women in the Menopausal Transition

Most Superpower reviews are written by tech reviewers or general health sites, so almost none of them speak to what women in their 40s, 50s and 60s should watch. That is the lens I care about, because the menopausal transition shifts several biomarkers at once, and a broad panel like this is well suited to catching those changes.

My iron result is a good example. For most of our lives, monthly blood loss keeps iron in check. Once that stops, iron has room to climb, and the research bears this out. A population study of 5,222 adults in the Journal of Clinical Medicine found that ferritin and hepcidin both ran about three times higher in postmenopausal women than in premenopausal women, with transferrin saturation modestly higher as well. That is why seeing serum iron, transferrin saturation and ferritin together on one report matters so much in midlife. A standard physical rarely orders all three, yet the combination is what tells you whether rising iron is a passing blip or something to act on, and as the EASL guidelines above make clear, the thresholds themselves shift once you are postmenopausal.

Beyond iron, the markers I would pay closest attention to on a Superpower panel are the sex hormones (estradiol, testosterone, FSH and SHBG), thyroid function, and the metabolic and cardiovascular group like fasting insulin, glucose, ApoB and hs-CRP. These are the numbers that quietly drift during perimenopause and often explain the fatigue, sleep changes and body composition shifts so many of us notice. Having them in one place, with plain-language context, is useful. It does not replace a menopause-literate clinician, but it gives you real data to bring to that conversation rather than a vague sense that something feels off.

The second included draw helps here more than it does for most people. Hormone markers in the menopausal transition move on their own, so a single reading tells you much less than two readings six months apart. If you are trying to work out whether a symptom pattern tracks with a measurable shift, that second panel is the part of the $349 that earns its keep. Superpower also sells deeper hormone panels as add-ons, and my take is to run the included markers first and only buy one if your results come back ambiguous or if your symptoms and your numbers disagree. That is a real scenario in perimenopause, and it is usually the moment to bring a clinician in rather than buy another test.

If you want a plain-language reference for what each of these markers means before your results land, grab my blood test biomarker cheatsheet below.

Where Superpower Falls Short

• The price rose 75 percent and the positioning went with it. At $199 Superpower was the obvious first panel. At $349 it sits $16 below Function Health, which means the budget argument is gone and you are choosing on features rather than cost.
• The headline biomarker count is contested. Function Health's pending lawsuit alleges the figure folds calculated ratios in with direct measurements, and Superpower's own footnotes now concede that it does, plus counts retested markers twice.
• The composite scores are softer than they look. Biological age and the Superpower Score are model outputs, not measurements, and mine disagreed sharply with two other services. Useful as a personal trend line, not as a verdict on your health.
• The action plan recommends supplements Superpower sells. That is a real conflict of interest and you should read the recommendations with it in mind. The advice I got was reasonable and not aggressive, but a company that profits from the fix is not a neutral party on whether you need the fix.
• Broad panels produce findings you then have to chase. A 2026 cross-sectional analysis in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine classified 191 unique tests across 76 direct-to-consumer wellness panels and found 58 percent were low-value or actively harm-driving, with the largest panel expected to generate 9.8 false positives per healthy consumer. My own out-of-range iron turned out to be worth investigating. Not every flag will be, and each one costs you time, money or worry.
• No refunds, and it is not available everywhere. Superpower states it does not offer refunds. It also operates in 41 states plus Washington DC, and is not yet available in Alaska, Arkansas, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota or Wyoming.
• It is not a replacement for a primary care provider or emergency care. Superpower says so itself, and you should still coordinate anything out of range with your doctor. If you've had trouble finding a progressive healthcare provider in your area, I've been very happy with my online provider Thrivelab and they even take insurance!
• Data alone does not improve your health. The results only pay off if you have the time and motivation to act on the plan, so if you know you will not follow through, the value drops.

Is Superpower Legit? What Reddit and Trustpilot Say

This question comes up constantly and it deserves a straight answer. Yes, Superpower is a legitimate company. It launched in 2023, raised significant venture funding, is LegitScript certified, and the actual blood work runs through Quest, the same accredited lab network your doctor likely uses. Your sample is not being analyzed by a startup in a garage. The lab science is standard. What varies is everything wrapped around it.

Since I only have my own experience, I went looking at what other customers report, and the pattern is fairly consistent across Trustpilot and Reddit.

• What people consistently praise: the breadth of the panel relative to price, how approachable the dashboard makes a large result set, and the speed of results. Several reviewers who had also used other testing services described Superpower as the better experience.
• Where complaints cluster: customer service consistency and fee stacking. Reviews split noticeably here, with some people describing responsive round-the-clock support and others describing a frustrating experience. One reviewer with a large following documented two separate scheduling failures, including a draw appointment cancelled without her being notified until after the window had passed.
• The recurring Reddit theme: the most-discussed thread is a straight comparison against Function Health rather than any accusation that Superpower is a scam. The criticisms that show up there are about information overload for people without a health background, about the supplement recommendations coming from a company that also sells supplements, and increasingly about how many of the advertised markers are derived rather than measured.

My read, having used it: the product is real and the panel is real, and the operational side is what you would expect from a company growing this fast. My scheduling went smoothly and results were faster than promised. Somebody else's got cancelled twice. If you are the sort of person who needs an appointment to hold firm the first time, and you cannot get a refund if it does not, that is a real consideration.

The broader caution is worth naming too. A 2023 review in BMJ Open catalogued direct-to-consumer tests sold online and found that a large share had limited or no established clinical utility for healthy consumers, and that many products disclosed neither pre-test nor post-test consultation. Superpower does better than that baseline because it includes a care team and its core panel is built from conventional, accredited lab markers. But the category as a whole earns its skepticism, and knowing that is what lets you use a service like this well instead of anxiously.

The Dashboard and Wearable Sync

As someone who has worn an Oura Ring for more than three years and layers a Whoop on top of it, I was curious whether Superpower's wearable integration was real or just a marketing checkbox. Superpower syncs with Oura, Whoop and Apple Health, and it lets you upload past lab PDFs from Quest or Labcorp so your history lives in one place. I tested the upload feature and it was quick and painless.

The wearable sync is more of a nice-to-have than a difference maker today. It pulls your data in and displays it alongside your labs, but it does not yet continuously adjust your protocol the way a fully closed-loop system would. Where the dashboard shines is turning a big, intimidating panel into something approachable. When my hs-CRP or a nutrient marker moved, the plan translated it into concrete steps rather than leaving me to interpret raw numbers. That translation layer is the real value here, especially if this is your first comprehensive panel.

Superpower vs Function Health vs Hundred Health

I have paid for all three of these services and run panels through each of them, so this comparison is based on what showed up in my own dashboards rather than a spec sheet. I have included a standard annual physical as the fourth column, because that is the real baseline most people are choosing against.

The short version has changed since the price rise. Superpower and Function Health are now the same product at the same price with the same two-draw structure, and the honest tiebreaker is what happens after your results land: Superpower lets you buy supplements at member pricing and fill a prescription inside the membership, while Function gives you clinician-reviewed flags and points you elsewhere to act. Hundred Health is now the budget pick at $199 and is where I go when I want hormone metabolism mapped properly rather than a single serum snapshot. None of them replaces a doctor. For the full head-to-head with cost math and biomarker overlap, see my Function Health vs Superpower comparison, my Hundred Health review and my breakdown of whether Function Health is worth it.

Tips to Get the Most Out of Superpower

• Time your draw around training. Schedule your blood draw at least 48 to 72 hours after any intense workout. Hard resistance training temporarily raises muscle-related enzymes and can make a marker look off when it is a timing artifact. I learned this the hard way when a liver enzyme spiked the day after a heavy leg session, then normalized on the next draw.
• Space the two draws properly. The second panel is the point of the new price. Six months between draws, taken under the same conditions and at the same time of day, is what makes the comparison mean something.
• Prep the basics. Hydrate well, follow any fasting instructions and wear loose sleeves for an easy draw.
• Skip the add-on cart on day one. Let your first set of results tell you where an add-on panel would earn its money before you buy anything extra.
• Look at the panel list before you pay. Given how the headline counts are built, the list of markers is the number that matters. Check that the ones you care about are on it.
• Pick one focus area. When your results land, choose a single system to work on for the next three to six months rather than trying to fix everything at once.
• Use the concierge. If a result confuses you, or a number reads normal but you still feel off, message the team instead of guessing.
• Take the out-of-range findings to your doctor. Bring the PDF. A real clinician putting your numbers in the context of your history is the step that makes any of this worth doing.

Is the Superpower Blood Test Worth It?

For what it sets out to do, Superpower is a strong product and I rate it 4.0 out of 5. That is down from the 4.3 I gave it earlier this year, and the reason is the price rather than the product. At $199 for a broad panel, Superpower was the easy recommendation for anyone who had never had comprehensive bloodwork. At $349 it is priced within $16 of Function Health, which has a longer track record and clinician review and $150 above Hundred Health (which is one of my favorites). The panel did not get worse. The argument for choosing it did.

What has not changed is where the value sits. The raw biomarker panel is what you are paying for, not the scores layered on top of it. Once I saw my biological age come back nearly eight years off from two other services, the composite metrics stopped feeling like results and started feeling like packaging. Buy this for the labs. Enjoy the dashboard but do not make life decisions based on the score.

The second included draw is the honest improvement in the new price, and for women in the menopausal transition it is worth more than it is for most people, because hormone markers move on their own and one reading tells you far less than two. If you will use both draws, the $349 is defensible. If you would only ever test once a year, you are now paying for a panel you will not take.

So here is where I land. Choose Superpower if you want to act on your results inside one membership, with member-priced supplements and prescription access in the same place as your data. Choose Function Health if clinician review matters more than a marketplace. Choose Hundred Health if the budget is the constraint or hormone depth and an actionable protocol is the goal. And whichever you pick, go in committed to following through, because a membership is only as valuable as what you do with the numbers.

👍 Pros

• Two blood draws a year are now included in the base price rather than one.
• Broad panel spanning heart, liver, kidney, sex hormones, metabolic health, nutrients, inflammation and thyroid.
• HSA and FSA eligible, which is worth roughly $87 to $122 off the real cost.
• Fast turnaround. Mine landed in four days against a stated 10 days or less.
• Member-priced supplements and prescription access sit inside the membership, so you can act on the plan without leaving it.
• Draws run through Quest at 2,000+ locations, so the underlying lab work is conventional and accredited.

👎 Cons

• The price rose from $199 to $349 on September 1, 2026, which removes the budget advantage entirely.
• The marketed biomarker count folds in calculated metrics and counts retested markers twice.
• Function Health's false advertising suit over that count is pending in federal court.
• Biological age came back 7.9 years higher than Function Health gave me on the same body.
• The action plan recommends supplements Superpower profits from selling.
• No refunds, unavailable in nine states, and customer service reports are inconsistent.

How I Keep This Review Current

Every screenshot here comes from my own Superpower dashboard. I re-check pricing, panel structure and marker counts against Superpower's own published pages each time I update, rather than carrying figures forward from the previous version, which is how the September 1 price change and the shift to two included draws caught my attention.

This Superpower Health review reflects my personal experience and is for general information only. It is not medical advice. Superpower is not a substitute for your primary care provider, and any results outside the normal range, including elevated iron markers, should be discussed with a qualified clinician.