Skip to content

Hume Pod 2.0 Review: Is the Hume Body Pod Accurate? My DEXA Comparison and Verdict

Cheryl McColgan
NASM-CPT, E-RYT 500, BS Psychology and Graduate Training in Clinical Psychology

Updated September 21, 2026.

This Hume Pod review now includes two weeks of hands-on testing on the new Hume Pod 2.0. Prior to receiving the Hume Pod 2.0, I have been using the original version since 2024.

I got the Hume Body Pod back in 2024 for one reason. I wanted to know if an at-home scale could tell me what a DEXA scan tells me, without the drive, the expense, the appointment and the radiation. So I did the obvious thing, I got DEXA scans and I compared them, side by side, to what the Hume Pod told me on the same mornings. This full Hume Body Pod review is built on those numbers, plus years of daily use as a perimenopausal woman who strength trains five days a week.

The short version is that it was more accurate than I expected for the number I care about most, my overall body fat percentage and slightly less accurate for individual body parts. Here is exactly what I found. (If you want the full podcast conversation behind this review, the transcript is tucked at the bottom of this page.)

Disclaimer: Links may contain affiliate links, which means we may get paid a commission at no additional cost to you if you purchase through this page. Read our full disclosure here.

Quick Verdict: Hume Body Pod

My Rating: 4.6 out of 5

Best for: Tracking your body composition trend at home between DEXA scans, especially if you are watching skeletal muscle through perimenopause.

What it gets right: Consistency. On the Pod 2.0 I took four readings back to back in one session and body fat stayed within 0.1 points, which is the property that makes daily weigh-ins worth doing. On my original Pod, whole-body fat percentage landed within about 2 points of DEXA, weight within about 2.6 pounds and lean mass within about 3 pounds.

Where it falls short: Segmental readings are the weak spot on any bioimpedance device. On my original Pod, leg fat was off by roughly 37 percent versus DEXA. Single readings also move with your hydration. I have not re-run the DEXA comparison on the 2.0 yet, which is why my rating is holding at 4.6 rather than moving.

Price: 249 dollars, with an optional Hume Plus membership at 9.99 dollars a month. HSA and FSA eligible. There is a 45-day money-back guarantee, so you can test it against your own routine and return it if the numbers do not hold up for you.

Check the current Hume Body Pod 2.0 price Use code HEALNOURISHGROW at checkout for 20 percent off, which stacks on any sale Hume is running.

Hume sent me the Pod 2.0 to review but my rating and everything I report here are my own.

Prefer to watch? Here is my hands-on test of the Hume Body Pod, including how I ran the DEXA comparison.

Medical disclaimer: I am a NASM certified personal trainer, not a physician. Body composition tools are for general wellness tracking and are not diagnostic. Talk to your doctor before making decisions based on any at-home measurement.

What's New in the Hume Pod 2.0

Front of the Hume Pod 2.0 retail box, labeled as a smart body composition analyzer
The Pod 2.0 box. Hume labels it a smart body composition analyzer.

Hume sent me the new Hume Pod 2.0 to review ahead of its September 21 launch. I got the white one, which is a limited edition, so black is the colour most people will be able to buy.

The change that matters is where the electrodes sit. On this generation the Hume logo on the base is made from the electrodes themselves, so your bare feet touch the sensors directly instead of the signal passing through the glass surface. Hume describes this as producing a cleaner, more consistent reading and says it should help people with dry skin who have had readings fail to register. That is the whole hardware story, along with the second colour.

hume pod 2 0 review white overhead
The foot electrodes on the Pod 2.0 are the Hume logo itself, so your bare feet stand directly on the sensors.

It is worth understanding why a contact change is not a trivial one, because this is the part the spec sheet does not explain. The electrode and skin interface is a documented source of measurement error in bioimpedance. A study of 35 healthy adults in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition measured nine different electrodes used for bioimpedance and found their intrinsic resistance ranged from 11 to 665 ohms, a spread large enough to shift measured impedance vectors significantly. The authors concluded that contact impedance is a source of systematic error worth controlling for, not a rounding detail.

hume pod 2 0 foot electrodes handle
The handle docks at the top and pulls out for each reading. The unit is rechargeable, so there are no batteries to swap.

One caveat, that study used pregelled clinical electrodes, not the metal plates on a consumer body analyzer, so it establishes that the contact interface matters in principle rather than validating Hume's specific implementation.

How I Tested the Hume Pod 2.0

I have been weighing in on the Hume Pod 2.0 for about two weeks, using the same routine I always use for every reading: first thing in the morning, after the bathroom and before eating or drinking anything.

The main criticism of any bioimpedance device is that it is “noisy,” in other words, that you can step on it twice and get two different answers. So I tested that directly. I took four readings back to back in one session, stepping off and back on between each one so every reading started fresh. Here is what came back.

MetricReading 1Reading 2Reading 3Reading 4Spread
Body fat percentage22.6%22.5%22.5%22.6%0.1 points
Skeletal muscle75.6 lb75.6 lb75.7 lb75.5 lb0.2 lb
Weight156.1 lb156.0 lb156.1 lb156.1 lb0.1 lb

Four readings in a row landed within 0.1 points of each other on body fat, 0.2 pounds on skeletal muscle and 0.1 pounds on weight. What that measures is precision, meaning the device agrees with itself. It is not accuracy, which is whether the number is close to the truth. A device can be consistently wrong and the only way to test accuracy is against a reference method like DEXA.

Precision is still the property that decides whether a home body analyzer is useful. If the reading jumps around, your trend line is noise and you cannot separate a real change from measurement scatter. If it holds steady under the same conditions, a shift over weeks means something. On that test the Pod 2.0 did what I need it to do, and it was my experience with the old model that it had good precision. This allows you to track trends over time, which is really what is most important.

What I cannot tell you yet is how the 2.0's numbers line up against a DEXA scan. I am booking another one and when I have it I will add those results here the same way I did for my original Pod below. That is also why my rating is sitting at 4.6 for this Hume Pod Review rather than moving up for now.

Is the Hume Body Pod Accurate? My DEXA Comparison

Every number in this section comes from my testing on the original Hume Pod in 2024 and early 2025. I have not yet re-run this comparison on the Pod 2.0.

DEXA is the reference standard most people compare consumer scales against, so that is what I used. On a DEXA morning I stepped on the Hume Pod first, then went and got scanned, so the two measurements happened within the same window on the same day. Here is how the whole-body numbers compared on one of those matched days.

Whole-body metricDEXAHume Body Pod (same morning)Difference
Weight153.9 lb156.5 lb+2.6 lb
Body fat percentage26.1%24.0%2.1 points lower (about 8%)
Fat mass40.1 lb37.5 lb2.6 lb lower
Lean mass107.7 lb110.7 lb3.0 lb higher

For a home BIA scale, that is close. A two point body fat gap is well within what I expected and the Hume leaned slightly lean-flattering rather than wildly off. Now the honest part. When I looked at individual body parts, the picture changed, and it changed most in my legs.

Segment (fat)DEXAHume Body PodDifference
Right arm fat2.2 lb2.2 lb0%
Left arm fat2.3 lb2.2 lbabout 4% lower
Trunk fat17.6 lb19.2 lbabout 9% higher
Right leg fat7.8 lb4.9 lbabout 37% lower
Left leg fat8.1 lb5.1 lbabout 37% lower

My arms were nearly perfect and my legs were the weak spot. That matters if you are buying this to track limb-level fat and it matters less if, like me, you mostly want a reliable whole-body number you can watch over time. This is my body, an n of 1. My results do not guarantee yours. Your hydration, your build and your training will shift the numbers. Being as consistent as possible in the state and time you take the readings matters a lot. That is exactly why I like that Hume offers a 45-day money-back window, because the only way to know how it reads on you is to test it on you.

I have the raw data comparison from my DEXA scans and the Hume readings in a spreadsheet you can view here.

How the Hume Body Pod Works

The Hume Body Pod is a smart scale with eight electrodes, four under your feet and four in a handheld bar you hold out in front of you. It sends a tiny, harmless electrical current through your body and measures how that current is slowed down. Fat, muscle and water each resist the current differently, so the device uses that resistance, plus your height, age and sex, to estimate body fat, lean mass and more than 40 other metrics. This is called bioelectrical impedance analysis, or BIA.

The important thing to understand is that BIA does not measure fat directly. It estimates it from an equation. That is not a knock on Hume specifically, it is true of every impedance scale, and it is why the technology behind the number matters more than the marketing around it.

Back of the Hume Body Pod box listing the metrics it reports, including visceral fat, muscle mass and bone mass
The back of the box lists 17 of the metrics the Pod reports, and Hume puts the full count above 40 in the app. Bone mass is an estimate, not a bone density scan, so it does not replace a DEXA if you are watching for bone loss.

What the Research Says About BIA Accuracy

My single comparison lines up neatly with what the research already tells us about bioimpedance, and the research is more encouraging than the internet gives it credit for, as long as you are clear about what it is encouraging about.

Hume's own site cites a study by a lab called Socotech putting the Pod within about 3 percent of DEXA, but a manufacturer's number is only as good as the independence behind it. The more useful study came out in July 2026. Researchers at Texas Tech University's body composition lab bought an original Hume Pod online and tested it on 67 adults, 42 of them women, against both DEXA and a four-compartment model, which is a more rigorous lab reference method.

Against the four-compartment model, its body fat, fat mass and lean mass estimates were statistically equivalent at the group level and the authors placed it among the more accurate consumer analyzers their lab has tested. Against DEXA it read body fat about 1.8 points lower on average and fat mass about 1.3 kilograms lower, which lines up closely with my own original Pod: 2.1 points lower on body fat and 2.6 pounds lower on fat mass. Two notes on this, it is a preprint on medRxiv, meaning it has not been through peer review yet and it tested the original Pod rather than the Pod 2.0.

A 2023 validation study in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition tested bioimpedance devices against DEXA in 75 people who completed the full protocol, recruited across a range of body sizes. After correcting for a systematic bias, the devices produced stable, reliable and accurate body composition estimates, with precision comparable to but lower than laboratory equipment. The finding that matters most for a device like the Pod: the study also ran eight-electrode bioimpedance of the same configuration the Pod uses, four contacts at the hands and four at the feet, and found no significant difference between it and the wrist devices for fat-free mass. The catch was that lower precision means you need more repeat measurements than DEXA before you can be confident a change is real. In other words, bioimpedance is good at trends when you measure consistently.

A 2024 study in Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes put the limits more bluntly. Researchers compared bioimpedance to DEXA for fat mass in 309 Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes, a group chosen specifically because diabetes affects hydration and hydration is bioimpedance's weak point. They found it accurate at the group level and not accurate for any single individual, but precise enough to be reliable for tracking one person's progress over time.

Worth noticing that this study found bioimpedance tended to overestimate body fat, while both my original Pod and the Texas Tech data had the Hume reading below DEXA. The direction of the error depends on the device, its equations and the person standing on it. What holds across all of these studies is that the error is systematic for a given person on a given device, which is exactly why the trend is trustworthy and any single absolute number is not. Do not obsess over one reading, watch the direction it moves over time.

And before anyone treats DEXA as flawless, it is worth knowing that even DEXA has quirks at the limb level. Research in the journal Obesity compared DEXA against CT in 91 premenopausal women across a wide range of body weights and found DEXA underestimated trunk and thigh fat and overestimated thigh muscle, with the error growing as body weight increased. Hydration did not significantly affect most DEXA measurements, with thigh fat the one exception. So my 37 percent leg fat gap is partly the Hume estimating and partly two different methods disagreeing in exactly the region where they are both known to be least certain.

Hume Body Pod Review: Where It Was Accurate and Where It Missed

This read is based on my testing of the original Hume Pod. The bioimpedance limits below apply to any device of this type, the Pod 2.0 included.

Pulling my data and the research together, here is my honest read on where the Hume Body Pod earns its place and where you should not lean on it.

Trust it for: your whole-body fat percentage trend, your weight and your total lean mass, as long as you weigh in under the same conditions each time. Mine tracked within about two points of DEXA on fat percentage and stayed consistent day to day, which is what makes a trend line usable.

Be skeptical of: individual body part readings, especially legs and any single absolute number taken on a day when your hydration is off. If you weigh in dehydrated after a hard training day, or bloated, the number will move even if your actual fat did not. This is not a Hume flaw, it is physics, and it applies to every bioimpedance scale on the market.

Now that you know your number, here is how to move it

Watching skeletal muscle is only useful if you are doing something to protect it, and after 40 that starts with getting enough protein. Grab my free 7 day high protein meal plan and stop guessing at it.

Hume Body Pod vs DEXA vs Other Scales

To put the Hume in context, here is how it stacks up against a clinical DEXA scan and the body composition scales people cross-shop it with. I have included the two that undercut it hardest on price, because the question I get most often is some version of “why would I pay this much when there is a cheaper body fat scale on Amazon.”

MethodHow it measuresSegmental?Best forRough cost
DEXA scanX-ray absorptiometryYes, and it is the referenceThe most accurate single snapshot, plus bone densityAround 100 to 150 dollars per scan, varies widely by region
Hume Pod 2.08-electrode BIA, hands and feetYesFrequent at-home whole-body trend tracking with a polished app249 dollars, optional 9.99 per month
Renpho MorphoScan Nova8-electrode BIA with handle displayYesThe closest feature match to the Pod at a lower priceAbout 220 dollars list, often under 200
GE Segmental CS10G8-electrode dual-frequency BIA with handleYes, five body segmentsThe budget way into segmental readingsAbout 86 to 100 dollars
Withings Body CompFoot-to-foot BIANoSimple daily weigh-ins with an ecosystem appAbout 230 dollars
InBody (clinic)Multi-frequency BIAYesGym or clinic spot checks with a technicianFree to 50 dollars per scan

The Hume's edge over a foot-to-foot scale like the Withings is the handheld bar, which adds upper-body electrodes and gives it a more complete circuit than feet alone. That is a real architectural difference and it is why the Pod can report limb-level readings at all.

Its edge over the MorphoScan Nova or the GE CS10G is not the electrode count, though, because those are eight-electrode segmental devices too and the GE costs roughly a third of what the Pod does. If a spec sheet is all you care about, you could conisder the GE. What you pay the difference for with Hume is the app, the money back guarantee, the way the metrics are presented and independent lab data behind the original Pod, which the research section above covers. Whether that is worth 150 dollars is a fair question and the answer is not automatically yes. I use the Hume because its app is the one I open every day (and use with the Hume Band).

Its edge over DEXA is not accuracy, it is access. You can step on it every single morning for roughly the price of two scans.

Price and Is the Hume Body Pod Worth It

The Hume Body Pod 2.0 launch price is $280 dollars and with my Hume Body Pod discount code, the subtotal before tax comes to $224. The app works for free, but the fuller experience, with coaching, nutrition tracking and weekly reports, sits behind Hume Plus at 9.99 dollars a month. You do not need the subscription to get your body composition numbers, so factor it in only if you want the extra guidance.

hume body pod discount

Here is the cost math that made it make sense for me. A single DEXA scan near me runs about 150 dollars and to track a trend properly you want a scan every few months. Two or three DEXA scans a year and you are already past the price of the Pod, which you can step on daily. If your goal is watching your body composition move as you train and eat, it pays for itself quickly as a between-scans tool. I still get an occasional DEXA to recalibrate my expectations (and as part of my job) then let the Hume fill in the daily picture.

It is also HSA and FSA eligible, which is worth checking before you pay out of pocket.

The reason I feel comfortable recommending you try it is the 45-day money-back guarantee. You can buy it, weigh in against your own routine for several weeks and send it back for a full refund if the readings do not hold up for you. That is about as risk-free as body composition tech gets and given everything above about bioimpedance being person-specific, testing it on your own body is the only way to know.

Check the current Hume Body Pod 2.0 price here. My Hume Pod discount code, HEALNOURISHGROW, takes 20 percent off at checkout and stacks on any sale they are running.

How to Get Accurate Readings

Because BIA moves with hydration, consistency is what turns a noisy number into a useful trend. The research on wearable BIA is clear that repeat measurements under stable conditions are what let you trust a change. Here is the routine that kept my readings steady.

  • Weigh in first thing in the morning, after using the bathroom and before eating or drinking.
  • Measure barefoot with dry hands and feet, standing on the same surface each time.
  • Keep the handheld bar at the same height and posture every reading.
  • Watch the weekly and monthly averages in the app, not the single daily number.
  • Do not compare a reading taken after a hard workout or a salty meal to a normal-hydration day.

One more variable almost nobody mentions and it matters if you eat lower carb. Bioimpedance reads body water and how you eat shifts where that water sits. A study in Medicina measured 100 women under tightly controlled conditions, all in the same phase of their cycle, and found those eating a moderately lower carbohydrate diet had a different balance of intracellular to extracellular water than those eating more carbohydrate, enough to influence their bioimpedance body composition results. The women were 18 to 30 and it was a cross-sectional comparison rather than a controlled trial, so I would not read it as proof that carbs cause a specific reading change. What it does mean is that if you change how you eat, some of the movement you see in the first couple of weeks is water redistribution rather than fat or muscle. Give it time before you draw conclusions.

The dry hands and feet point on that list means not wet or sweaty. Chronically dry skin is a separate problem, since it can make contact so poor that a reading will not register at all and that is what Hume says the Pod 2.0's electrode change is designed to help with.

Hume Pod vs Hume Band: Which Do You Need

Hume makes two different products and people mix them up constantly. The Body Pod is the scale in this review, built for body composition. The Hume Band is a wearable that tracks daily activity, sleep and recovery metrics on your wrist. They answer different questions. If you want to know what your body is made of, that is the Pod. If you want to know how your body is functioning day to day, that is the Band. And if you want a system for these two things that gives you a complete picture of your metabolic health, use them both.

I use both and wrote a full Hume Band review here, plus a Hume Band vs Whoop comparison if you are choosing a wearable.

My Verdict

The Hume Body Pod did the job I bought it for. It tracked my whole-body fat percentage within about two points of DEXA and gave me a steady daily number I could build a trend on. It was less accurate for my legs and like every bioimpedance scale it moves with hydration, so I would not treat any single reading as gospel. But as a way to watch my body composition change between DEXA scans, without the appointment and the cost each time, it earned its spot on my bathroom floor.

The Hume Pod 2.0 has held that up over two weeks of daily use and the repeatability I measured on it is the thing I care most about in a device like this. I am holding my rating at 4.6 out of 5 until I have a DEXA comparison on the new hardware, because a redesigned electrode path deserves a real accuracy test rather than my assumption that it should help. When I have those numbers I will update this section with them.

This is my data on my body, an n of 1. The only way to know how it reads on you is to test it, and the 45-day guarantee means you can do that without real risk. Try the Hume Body Pod 2.0 here and run your own comparison.

Podcast Episode and Transcript

I talked through this whole comparison on the podcast (27:24). Press play on the video above, or expand the full transcript if you would rather read it. This episode was recorded when I was testing the original Hume Pod, so the numbers I talk through are from that device rather than the Pod 2.0.

Read the full podcast transcript-Click to Expand

Cheryl McColgan (00:01.262) Hey everyone, welcome to the HealNursery podcast. Today I am going to discuss a product that I've been using for a while and this will be a little bit different of a podcast episode, although it will weave in some of the tools that I've used over the years to be consistent. And one of those things is the simple body scale. So I'm one of those weirdos that I weigh every single day. I just look at it as data. And I really feel like over the years, this is what's helped me be really consistent and not gain or lose too much weight in any one given time. I know a lot of people are not very excited about using a scale or having daily weigh-ins, but I really do think it's a valuable tool if you're a person that can just treat it as data and not allow whatever the number on the scale says to wreck your day, basically. Because body weight is so dependent really on just day-to-day hydration, whether or not you had a salty meal the night before, that sort of thing. And so what I've noticed over the years is that literally my weight can fluctuate within a week of anywhere from a pound or almost the same every day all the way up to a five pound difference, just depending again, mainly on hydration. if you can look at it that you know, People will often say this and it drives me nuts. I gained three pounds this week or I gained three pounds yesterday and it's like you really didn't. You didn't gain three pounds of fat overnight. You probably just ate something really salty the day before. So what's really important is more the idea of tracking your weight over time and looking for trends and having the ability to have a weekly average or something like that with your weight. So you really just want to look at it as data and not let whatever that number is on any given day rule your world. The other reason that we need to be concerned about body weight and why just a regular scale is not all that useful is because there's never been a really great way to track your body composition using a regular scale. So your regular scale just tells you your weight. It doesn't tell you anything about how much percent fat you have or how much muscle you have. Cheryl McColgan (02:22.606) or anything like that. as I've been going through my little weightlifting consistency thing over the last 18 months, you know, it's been a big goal of mine to put on more muscle. so oftentimes what has happened on the scale, and I can track this because I've gotten several decks of scans over time when I was making this a new goal of mine, is that, for example, in a six month period, even though I'd been working out really consistently and doing a lot of things that should have affected my weight. If I was looking at my weight as just the number on the scale, after six months, my weight was exactly the same. It was crazy. And if you didn't have some kind of tool like a dexter or whatever, you might've thought, I didn't make any progress at all. And it would really be easy to get discouraged. But what actually happened in that amount of time is that I had put on three pounds of muscle and lost three pounds of fat at the same time. which is really amazing. Yet with a traditional scale, all you'd get on the scale is that you were exactly the same. And so that can be really defeating. And so one of the tools, and I've talked about this over before, that I've used over the years is a body fat scale. And they use bioelectrical impedance to send electrical current through your body. And basically the way that it works is that your muscle holds a lot more water than fat. it, the electrical signal passes through it. I always get this little confused, but it's either it passes through it more quickly or less quickly than that. And that's how they tell the difference. And so then using some kind of calculation and algorithm, they're able to predict your body fat and your muscle mass based on that electrical signal. Now, when these first came out, they were not very consistent at all, but I've always been an early adopter and I've always been involved in the health and wellness space for a really long time. So I had one of the first ones that came out, a bioelectrical impedance scale. based on, know, I think I had my first, like I had a hydrostatic, which is where you actually immerse yourself in water. And this used to be the gold standard of body composition, you get immersed in water to do your body fat. And I had had the scale at the same time. So I knew. Cheryl McColgan (04:43.286) that the scale was really off. But what has always been good for is trends because what it will do relatively well is track over time, are you losing fat, gaining fat, losing muscle, gaining muscle. So in that way, it was kind of useful. then it still is just acts like a regular scale and tells you you're right every day. So the first one I had probably 15 years ago or whenever those first came out, not that great, but had it for years. And then probably about five years ago, I'd say I invested in a new one. was a withings and it was definitely better and had some other little features that I really liked. Like it had a cardiovascular health number that was based on, there's this other thing that it can measure with the electrical current and kind of tell you the ideas if your vessels are flowing more openly or more closed and kind of just give you some indicator of cardiovascular health. So I really liked the withings scale for that. had that for several years. Also knew that based on DEXA that it wasn't really very accurate in comparison what the body fat actually was. And so then I had the opportunity to try the Hume Health Field. I'm just going to show it to you. Here it is. And if you'll notice my background in the room right now, I'm in a different spot because I'm actually out in Utah snowboarding for two months. And so I actually brought this with me. So that should tell you something. Number one, I did want to finally do this review. But number two, like I said, it's really important for me to stand track. have some other body composition goals this year that I'm working on and I didn't want to go for like nine weeks without this tool. So the fact that I carried it with me in my luggage should tell you that I at least think it is pretty good. that is the, you know, this is the upshot of the review is that I do like it a lot, but I'm going to tell you kind of some of the downsides to it, the upsides to it, what I found it to be. in relation to dexics, and had two dexes, well three dexes actually, since I've had this, and since I've been using it, but what I really wanted to do, so I could do this review for you guys, is to take my measurement with this Hume scale at home, and then immediately not changing my hydration or anything like that, going directly to my dexa and getting those numbers so that I could compare them. Cheryl McColgan (07:03.904) And so that's what I've done. so again, here's the scale. And so what's different about this when it has this thing that pulls out, this is that you put your hands on it while you're standing on this scale so that it has more points of contact with your skin to do the bioelectrical impedance. And if you go to a gym that has an in-body, that's the same technology. And a lot of people think that in-body is pretty good. So you're getting a technology now years later that is vastly better. It's still not perfect, but then Dexa is not really perfect either. When you get a Dexa scan, every different machine has a little bit different measurements. And you can tell this because when you see the document that I have where I have the Dexa scans that I was getting in Utah on the scanner there, and then the different Dexas that I was getting when I got back to Ohio, a different scanner gives you different numbers. And it's not that your body composition. magically change overnight, it's that each individual machine, number one, they have two different algorithms that they use on the DEXA to calculate body fat. so it really depends on which one they use. And I learned about this because when I went to the new DEXA in Ohio, I had told him I had been getting them before and he said, Oh, do you know what formula they used? And I said, no. And he said, well, there's two different ones and it can give you a different results. So the main thing is once you start using a DEXA is just try to go to the same facility in the same machine every time that'll give you the most consistency. And then know that if you go to a different one, I actually had one too at a conference a few years ago and that the machine gave me kind of some different numbers at the time too. So there's nothing that's going to be perfect. And so even a DEXA scanner has a margin of error every time that you're on it. And so based on hydration, based on the margin of error, you're getting something like a variance of five to 10 % in any given set of readings. And so it's just important to keep that in mind. So again, with any of these tools, what you're looking for is change over time and you're trying to be as consistent as possible with when you weigh. So typically what I do with either the DEXA or just when I get on the scale in the morning, I get up, first of all, I at night, you know, I have a kind of a routine of Cheryl McColgan (09:23.66) when I'm drinking before bed and things like that, it's not perfect. They don't always cut it off at the same time every night. So that can cause some variance. But basically, you know, after I go to bed, I don't drink anything in the middle of the night ever really, unless I am just like desperately needing some for some reason. But so I'll wake up, I'll go to the bathroom, get on the scale. Ideally, you want to be naked because you want the variance of the clothes being involved every time. And, you know, put my hands on the electrodes and stand on the scale, get the reading, and then I go on with my day, have my coffee, drink my morning glass of water, all that kind of good stuff. So, and it's consistent as you be with the same time every morning. If you were really good about your hydration and you kind of really drink almost the same thing every single day, like keep track of your ounces of water, like we all should be doing better about, I'm actually working on that myself right now. but then in cutting it off at the same time every night and then getting up at the same time every morning and getting that review on the scale, that is going to give you the most consistent results. When I can tell big variance on the scale is when I'm dehydrated or conversely, if I had a really salty meal or something like that the night before or went out the night before. So for example, dehydration, if you drink alcohol, you might notice that it dehydrates you. And so anytime we had a night where we'd go out and say, have some wine with dinner, something like that. or we had wine with dinner at home. Actually, that's a better example because the level of salt in the food is totally normal and everything like that. So what I would find on a night after having wine, I'd wake up and the scale would be down sometimes as much as two to three pounds just because of the dehydration caused by alcohol. Conversely, if I go out to dinner at a Mexican restaurant or really any restaurant, but they use a lot more salt, there's often ingredients that my body's not necessarily used to. And then what will usually happen on a night like that, I might wake up and get on the scale and my weight is off another two or three pounds in the up direction. So number one, again, no reason to panic. You didn't magically gain three pounds of fat overnight, but what you will notice is that your scale, if you're using one of these bio, any bioelectric impedance scale, because of the hydration levels is how it reads your body fat and your muscle mass. Cheryl McColgan (11:40.462) you will notice that those wildly fluctuate too. So for example, you might be going along during a week, you ate at home every night, you're doing well, blah, blah. Everything's the same and all the readings will be very, very similar throughout that whole week until you have one of those days where something was different and boom, you might see your muscle mass suddenly drop way down. And it's nice because the app, and I'll just show you this right now, pull it up so that you can see what I'm talking about, but it does a graph and you can do it by day, or month. And so, For example, if I put it on week, you'll see that, you know, obviously there's some fluctuations day to day in that. And let me scan back and see if I can find any other big, well, that's for the week ones, but the daily ones, like I said, is where you'll see quite often some big variants. So this is why you track over a week, because you can see sometimes it's really consistent when I'm, you know, eating at home and having level of hydration and then boom, it might pop up because I went out or something. or levels of hydration change. So that looks like that on every single one of these. That was weight, and I'll pop over to here to lean mass. You can see here was a big spike in lean mass. I didn't magically gain more lean mass overnight. But you can see if you're tracking over time, and let me pop over to the month view. So then you can see that that's where it's important. You want to get those trends. So you can see that my weight has been trending down over the last several months. working on that purposely. And that gives you a glimpse of the app too. It's really nice because it breaks it down into weight, body fat percentage, muscle mass, fat mass. It does it by each arm and each leg, just like Dexa will tell you how much you've gained or lost mass in each body part. so I think I'm to the point now where you can see it's not perfect. And again, I described the Dexa, it's not perfect either. But according to Hume, their results show that they correlate with the amount 2 % of DEXA in general. And they did some studies on that. And then I also pulled up a more recent study on bioelectrical impedance. And it just talked about the variance even in the clinical level setting of these tools. So no tools would be perfect, but I do and have found it to be very useful and useful for tracking. So what I did for this video, and if you're listening to this on the podcast, you might want to pop over to the show notes and just take a look. I put this all. Cheryl McColgan (14:06.102) in a spreadsheet. You know, kind of geeky like that if you know me. Anyway, I want to just compare the readings that I got the day that I got the DEXA in the morning that I stepped on the Hume scale and compare them for you. So I'm going to attempt I've never done this before, but I should be able to share a window in my computer. And so if you're watching on YouTube, you'll be able to see that. So I'm going to share the spreadsheet. that I created and this will be in the show notes a link to this document. So hopefully this is showing up correctly right now and that you can see it. But you'll notice I highlighted some of things in yellow there. And what I observed is that the thing that the scale is most accurate on compared to Dexa is the lean mass. And this is actually pretty cool because that's really what I've been working towards the last. You know, going on two years now and just trying like prioritizing protein. I've been doing that for a couple of years before I started lifting. And then now since I have been consistently lifting for the past 18 months, this has been something I have really wanted to work on is, you know, increasing that lean mass. And it's for all the reasons that I've talked about in many podcasts before just aging well, keeping up your strength, being able to do the things that you want to do daily in life. is. absolutely improved my snowboarding ability. I noticed a pretty big difference on the mountain in my leg strength and how my legs feel after a day in the deep house. So it's been pretty cool to experience that. But you'll see if you look at some of these numbers that if you look at the DEXA number that I got, like for example, the right arm lean on this September DEXA was 5.6 and then the Hume said it was 6.2 and then This was actually one of the biggest differences here. But then you'll see the right leg, 17.5, Hume said 19. I find that the Hume in general overestimates a little bit on the lean mass and underestimates a little bit on the fat. That might be a marketing ploy, maybe just to make you feel a little better about yourself. But you know, when I calculated the percent change and I'm… Cheryl McColgan (16:19.182) Fairly sure that I did this right. We're looking at anywhere between 2 % to 10 % variance. There's one thing I noticed on the trunk fat and trunk lean on the app. For some reason, it's not reporting the right numbers anymore. The trunk lean should be in the 50s, and one of them, it's coming out on the Hume is like 19 in the app. So I think that's just an app glitch. I actually did submit a ticket to the developers so that they know about that. If you want to look at this further, have three tabs that has three different DEXAs and the results of the Hume. So you can look at that a little closer if you're interested in this kind of thing. So I'm just going to go ahead and stop that for now. But what I observed, the trends over time are accurate. So if it was saying that I was losing body fat on the DEXA, which I did, it was also showing that I lost body fat on the Hume. And like I said, the body parts specific ones are fairly close to what the Dexa was reading. And again, there's always these variances, so not too worried about it. I'm more just interested in tracking these things over time. And you know, it's the best tool that we have for an at home way to track these things right now. So even though it's not perfect, I find it's really useful. I've been enjoying it. It's kept me more consistent. It's definitely interesting to look at all that data each morning when I get up and particularly now that I've used it for several months. Like I said, the day-to-day things, can't really put any stock in that. The weekly trends, yes, you can see that because you'll see, I lost a little weight or might have lost a little fat this week. But then the monthly ones are really where you're going to see it. And that's why I wanted to wait until, like I said, now it's been six months that I've been using it because if I just use it for the first month or something, I'm not really going to be able to know if it is accurately tracking the trends because that's just not enough data yet. And so I think it'll be interesting to just keep using this over time because then I can see, okay, if I get ready to do the thing that I've been thinking about as a goal this year, and I'm not quite ready to announce it yet, but there should be a pretty big difference in some of those numbers. And so I'll be able to more closely track that. And if I go through with this, I will definitely do another report a few months down the road so you can see those new numbers and how. Cheryl McColgan (18:41.9) they changed on the Hume compared to the Dexa, because they'll get another Dexa at the beginning and end of this process, so I can see how things went. anyway, the other thing about it is because I have ended up liking it and using it and wanted to be involved with this and use it and test it out, I did get a code with them. And so if you go to healnourishgrow.com slash humehealth, you get an additional percentage off. And whenever it's on sale, like right now it's on sale. If you happen to be watching this when it first comes out, is on sale 35 % off for Valentine's Day. Well, my code stacks on top of that. So that's pretty awesome. And it always stacks on top of it as far as, you know, unless they change that at some point in the future. But right now, if you use my code, healnourishgrow, or just go to that link that I said, it'll automatically put the code in. And so whatever the sale price is, you get more off on top of that. So if you have any specific questions about it, please make sure you reach out to me or leave it in the comments below. If you came to my channel, by the way, on YouTube, because you were looking for a view for Hume Health, I hope you'll subscribe and stay with me. I talk about all things health and wellness here. I have great guests on the podcast. We talk about all kinds of random health and wellness kind of things. And if you subscribe and support the channel, that's really the best thing you can do to support it is subscribe. the more popular it is, the more people find it, the more I can get good guests and share more of this kind of information with you. So I would really appreciate that. Hit the like button, all that good stuff, leave a review on iTunes. And yeah, so I hope this was helpful. I will also have in the show notes, I'm going to actually write out some of these points in an article to support this video. And there might be more details there. might link, well, for example, I'll link, there's a study, a screenshot. linked in the spreadsheet that I was just showing you that is from a recent 2025 study by a Dutch group talking about dexas and their accuracy, or sorry, bioelectrical impedance scales and their accuracy. And then I'll also probably add in there one about the dexa accuracy and some of the limitations of that. if you listen to people in this space that are really focused on muscle health, for example, Dr. Gabrielle Lyon, Cheryl McColgan (21:01.55) You know, none of the tools that we have right now to measure body composition are all that great. And she's been saying that for quite a while now. So, but this is the best we have. And so if you're a person, if you are working on body composition things, trying to lose weight, one thing I would caution if you're trying to lose weight, you know, you want to lose fat, you don't want to lose muscle mass. So that's one important thing to track on this. That's one thing that people have been struggling with when they decide to use GLP-1s is a lot of people lose muscle mass on that. if you're just losing weight in general, even if you're not losing weight loss, that's a really common thing because you have to. And this is the other thing we always talk about here, right? Prioritize protein, especially when you're doing a fat loss day. So you want to shoot for one gram of protein per pound of ideal body weight. So for example, if you are, say you're a woman who's about average height, five foot five, something like that, and you weigh 160, but your ideal weight is 100. 30, then you'd for at least 130 grams of protein a day and you go a little above that. If also, if you are strength training on a regular basis, doing that quite a lot, you might want to go even for a little more than that or at least the high end of that range. So anytime you're in a fat loss phase, weight loss phase, eat more protein, it helps protect your muscle mass and also lift some weights while you're trying to lose weight. will protect your muscle mass. I suspect there's some studies, even if you're not lifting quote unquote, super heavy, you're trying to stimulate your muscles to know that you need them and you need them to stick around. So when you're in a calorie deficit, you don't want your body deciding to break down the muscles because you're not being used. So anything you can do to stimulate muscle growth, muscle protein synthesis, the other thing is eating at least 30 grams of protein every single meal that you eat so that you stimulate muscle protein synthesis. anyway, again, this, video was meant to be mainly a review, but also throwing those things in, obviously, that we always talk about here so that if you are working on fat loss, that you will not make some of the mistakes that really hurt people in their endeavors to do that. So again, hope you enjoyed this. Let me know in the comments below if you have any questions about the human health scale. I'll still be over here using it every day either way. And I would love to hear your experiences too. Have you tried it? Are you looking at getting it? Cheryl McColgan (23:27.086) What are your thoughts? you already have one of these kind of scales? Because like I said, this is definitely the best one I've ever owned up to this point. It's a lot more consistent. It's a lot more close in the numbers to the actual body fat and the lean mass percentages, all that kind of stuff. Again, it's not perfect, but pretty much the best we have for at home right now. So anyway, take care and I will talk to you again soon.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's new in the Hume Pod 2.0?

The electrodes moved. The Hume logo on the base is now made from the electrodes themselves, so your bare feet contact the sensors directly instead of the signal passing through the glass surface. Hume says this produces a cleaner reading and helps people with dry skin whose readings sometimes failed to register. It also comes in black and a limited edition white.

Is the Hume Body Pod accurate?

For whole-body numbers, yes, close enough to be useful. On my original Pod, body fat percentage came within about 2 points of my DEXA scan on the same morning, weight within 2.6 pounds and lean mass within 3 pounds. Segmental readings were a different story, with leg fat off by roughly 37 percent. Treat the whole-body trend as reliable and individual limb readings with caution. An independent July 2026 study from Texas Tech found the same pattern on the original Pod across 67 adults, with body fat reading slightly below DEXA on average.

How accurate is the Hume scale for body fat percentage?

On my original Pod, body fat percentage read 24.0 percent against 26.1 percent on DEXA the same morning, about 2 points lower. That is a good result for a home bioimpedance device. Research suggests the error tends to be systematic for a given person and device, which is why the direction your number moves over weeks is more trustworthy than any single reading.

How does the Hume Body Pod work?

It is an 8-electrode bioelectrical impedance (BIA) scale. Four electrodes sit under your feet and four are in a handheld bar. It passes a small, safe current through your body and uses the resistance it meets, along with your height, age and sex, to estimate body fat, lean mass and 40-plus other metrics.

Is the Hume Body Pod accurate for women?

As a lean, perimenopausal woman who strength trains, my whole-body fat percentage on my original Pod tracked within about 2 points of DEXA, so it worked well for me for trend tracking. My legs were the weak spot, so if lower-body composition is what you are tracking, that is where I would lean on DEXA. Because it is an n of 1, I would not promise it reads the same on you. The 45-day money-back guarantee lets you test it on your own body and return it if it does not hold up.

How much does the Hume Body Pod 2.0 cost?

It is 249 dollars. The app is free to use, and an optional Hume Plus membership with coaching and nutrition tracking is 9.99 dollars a month. You do not need the subscription to see your body composition numbers. It is also HSA and FSA eligible.

Is the Hume Body Pod 2.0 worth it?

It depends what you want from it. At 249 dollars it is not the cheapest route to segmental body composition, and eight-electrode competitors exist for well under half that. What you pay the premium for is the app and how the data is presented. If you will open it every morning and act on the trend, it earns its place. If you just want raw numbers, a cheaper device does that. Against DEXA, it costs roughly the same as two scans and you can use it daily. With a 45-day money-back guarantee you can try it risk-free and return it if it does not fit your routine.

Is Hume Health legit?

Yes. Hume Health is a real company selling body composition and wearable products, and the Body Pod uses standard 8-electrode BIA technology. My own DEXA comparison confirmed its whole-body numbers were in a believable range rather than marketing fiction. An independent July 2026 study from Texas Tech University, not yet peer reviewed, also placed the original Pod among the more accurate consumer analyzers that lab has tested.

Hume Body Pod vs DEXA: how different are they?

On the same morning, my original Pod's whole-body numbers were close to DEXA, within about 2 points on body fat percentage and 2.6 pounds on weight. Limb readings diverged much more, with leg fat off by around 37 percent. DEXA is the more accurate single snapshot and gives you bone density too. The Pod is less accurate in absolute terms and far more available, so it fills in the daily trend between scans.

Do you need the Hume Plus subscription?

No. Your core body composition metrics work without it. Hume Plus at 9.99 dollars a month adds coaching, nutrition tracking and weekly reports, so it is only worth it if you want that extra guidance.

Can more than one person use the Hume Pod?

Yes. The Pod supports multiple profiles and assigns readings based on your stats, so a household can share one device. Each person sets up their own profile in the app.

Hume Pod vs Hume Band: which should I get?

They do different jobs. The Body Pod is a scale for body composition. The Hume Band is a wrist wearable for activity, sleep and recovery. Get the Pod to track what your body is made of, and the Band to track how it is functioning day to day.

Who should not use the Hume Pod?

Because it sends a small electrical current through your body, check with your doctor before using it if you have a pacemaker or another implanted electronic device, or if you are pregnant. That caution applies to bioimpedance devices in general, not just to Hume.

Author

  • Cheryl McColgan

    Cheryl McColgan is the Founder and Editor in Chief of Heal Nourish Grow, where she has published evidence-based health and nutrition content since 2018.

    With over 30 years of experience in fitness, nutrition, and healthy living, and nearly 20 years of professional editorial and journalism experience, she brings both subject-matter depth and trained editorial judgment to everything on the site.

    Cheryl holds a degree in Psychology with a minor in Addictions Studies, completed graduate training in Clinical Psychology, and is a NASM Certified Personal Trainer and E-RYT Certified Yoga Instructor and trained in Yoga Therapy.

    She is the author of 21 Day Fat Loss Kickstart, Make Keto Easy, Take Diet Breaks and Still Lose Weight, The Grain Free Cookbook for Beginners, and Easy Weeknight Keto.

    Read more about Cheryl and the journey that created Heal Nourish Grow on the about page.

    Cheryl McColgan is the founder of Heal Nourish Grow, where she writes about protein, body composition, healthy aging, and evidence-based nutrition and wellness along with the everyday habits that actually make those things work in real life.

    With a background in psychology and graduate training in clinical psychology, plus nearly 20 years of experience in editorial and publishing, Cheryl approaches health from both a research and real-world perspective. She’s also been immersed in fitness and nutrition for more than 25 years, which gives her a practical lens most purely academic content tends to miss.

    Her work today focuses heavily on protein intake (especially for women), muscle retention, metabolic health, and sustainable fat loss, along with topics like sleep, wellness, recovery, and wearable health tech. You’ll also find a mix of high-protein, low-carb recipes designed to make hitting those goals easier without overcomplicating things.

    Cheryl’s interest in health and nutrition became more personal after navigating her own health challenges, which pushed her to dig deeper into how lifestyle, diet and daily habits impact long-term health. That experience continues to shape how she approaches everything on this site: practical, realistic, and focused on what actually works over time.
    What Cheryl Covers
    Most of the content here falls into a few core areas:

    Protein & Muscle Health: how much you actually need, especially for women and how to use protein to support strength, body composition, and aging
    Fat Loss & Metabolic Health: sustainable approaches that prioritize muscle retention and long-term results
    Healthy Habits & Lifestyle: sleep, movement, strength training, consistency, and the small things that compound over time
    Wearables & Recovery: real-world testing and comparisons of tools like Oura, Whoop and others
    High-Protein & Low-Carb Recipes: simple, realistic meals that support your goals without feeling restrictive
    Travel & Lifestyle: wellness-focused travel, outdoor experiences, and a slightly more elevated take on healthy living

    If you're new, here are a few good places to begin:

    30 Day Healthy Habits Challenge

    Protein Foundations

    High Protein Recipes

    About Cheryl & Heal Nourish Grow

    Coaching and Programs